4 ms·

I'm confused. Did you not read any media past the prism slides exposure ? The mode of this leak is not a pure data dump on the internet a la wikileaks but throu

I'm confused. Did you not read any media past the prism slides exposure ? The mode of this leak is not a pure data dump on the internet a la wikileaks but through a responsible journalist. Glenn Greenwald has been publishing detailed and specific accounts of different NSA activities almost on a daily basis... As an example: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-collaboration-user-data http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-co... How much more specific do you need it to be ?

ianhawes 13y ago
There is no smoking gun. These articles, without the documents/slides/files, to back them up, are little more than conjecture.
- chetanahuja 13y ago
  These articles, without the documents/slides/files, to back them up, are little more than conjecture Well now I'm sure you're trolling. Does the following sound "little more than conjecture". (These are quotes from the article that I linked in the post you replied to) The files show that the NSA became concerned about the interception of encrypted chats on Microsoft's Outlook.com portal from the moment the company began testing the service in July last year. Within five months, the documents explain, Microsoft and the FBI had come up with a solution that allowed the NSA to circumvent encryption on Outlook.com chats A newsletter entry dated 26 December 2012 states: "MS [Microsoft], working with the FBI, developed a surveillance capability to deal" with the issue. "These solutions were successfully tested and went live 12 Dec 2012." Two months later, in February this year, Microsoft officially launched the Outlook.com portal.