4 ms·

So you'd be fine if somenoe would follow you in a car with dark windows and park outside the building when you spend time at home/work/etc.? If there is no expe

So you'd be fine if somenoe would follow you in a car with dark windows and park outside the building when you spend time at home/work/etc.? If there is no expectation of privacy, there should not be a problem with that. How about drones? In a few years it should be possible to have anyone be followed by one all the time. Would you be fine with that? I think at a distinct point it becomes really creepy, especially if you don't know who is actually following you.

superuser2 13y ago
The car with dark windows example is how police surveillance has worked for decades. So while it would be uncomfortable, society is pretty clearly in agreement that that's an allowable investigative tool.
- bigiain 13y ago
  That's true - within the bounds of expected police resource usage. We all expect enough "probable cause" for a police officer's superior to approve dedicating sufficient manpower to do that. I'm less certain that "society is in agreement" with police ANPR systems hoovering up ~1000 number plate records per shift without any "probably cause" and archiving that time/location data permanently. I know it's happening - but mostly because people don't know about it, rather than because most people think it's OK…
  - superuser2 13y ago
    APBs existed before ANPR. It's pretty well known that police who are driving around also have their eyes open for known fugitives, stolen cars, etc. There has to be a reason for an ANPR read of your car to actually do anything. Making that electronic lets the cop focus on driving and increases the maximum number of cars he can be looking for.