7 ms·

The performance of DO has absolutely nothing to do with a dedicated box.

• chetanahuja 13y ago
  Maybe. And I'm curious to find out exactly how good the performance and connectivity of these boxes is compared to DO boxes, especially at these attractive prices. But these rather large per-box setup fees are a clear deterrent for a cash-strapped startup to even try things out.
  • rmoriz 13y ago
    I'm a customer of both and the author of two rubygems (one for the Hetzner API, one for the Digitial Ocean API). From my experience Hetzner is 10x faster, more reliable and more professional. e.g. no changes to production APIs without notice, no radical product changes (as seen with NL based vservers at DO) and much more. If you're looking for something in the US, you probably want to go with DO but for Europe only OVH can beat Hetzner (only sometimes). Both offer 1Gbit/s uplinks and direct connection to the largest and most important CIX in Europe (http://de-cix.net/ http://de-cix.net/) Hetzner and OVH are no startups burning money anymore. They make huge profits and are in business for over a decade. They know how to build, operate and scale things efficiently. They will not be gone in a couple of years. They are not as fast in providing "new stuff" (think of OpenStack IaaS/a Cloud Platform like AWs) but I bet this will change, too.
    • asb 13y ago
      What happened with the NL based DigitalOcean servers?
      • rmoriz 13y ago
        They stopped provisioning some of them for a couple of weeks. no word on their status and/or offer page. API calls just failed. Turns out that they ran out of IPv4 space but were not able to communicate that to their customers in a professional manner.
    • PascalW 13y ago
      I'm curious as well, what happened with DO NL?
  • dangrossman 13y ago
    Most startups choose AWS for their hosting, where they're paying a ~10x premium over dedicated boxes. Budget obviously isn't the deciding factor even for cash-strapped new tech companies, not when we're talking about just 100EUR.
    • chetanahuja 13y ago
      I find AWS pricing rather high (for the actual performance on offer) too. That's why my comparison was with Digital Ocean.
      • dangrossman 13y ago
        Cash-strapped startups are not choosing DigitalOcean, they're choosing AWS. That's their point of comparison. Your assertion was that 100EUR would be a barrier to startups, not just to yourself. http://www.dangrossman.info/2012/09/24/who-hosts-the-y-combinator-startups/ http://www.dangrossman.info/2012/09/24/who-hosts-the-y-combi...
        • chetanahuja 13y ago
          Heh... ok dude. Yeah, aws bad... hetzner good. Got it.
        • BookPage 13y ago
          Off-topic but do you get mistaken for the lecturer Dan Grossman? Especially around here since he did a coursera functional programming course earlier this year?
  • sachingulaya 13y ago
    Ping on my ex-4 is 200ms from California. My OVH box in Canada is 80ms by comparison. Latency is an issue.
    • X4 13y ago
      California <-> Germany : 200ms California <-> Canada : 80ms What's the problem? If you need decent response-time everywhere in the world, you go and buy Co-Location. http://www.hetzner.de/en/hosting/produktmatrix/racks http://www.hetzner.de/en/hosting/produktmatrix/racks
      • sachingulaya 13y ago
        No, the problem is I don't need decent response-time everywhere in the world. I need decent response time in California. That's where the majority of my visitors are from. Latency is the tradeoff you make when you buy overseas servers to save money.
    • X4 13y ago
      Just fyi. OVH AND Hetzner both got hacked multiple times. If you're an old OVH Customer, you probably know it.