So when you said that ordinary people should have more money, because they will spend that money and create jobs, thus improving the lives of the lower class, y

So when you said that ordinary people should have more money, because they will spend that money and create jobs, thus improving the lives of the lower class, you want it understood that it is in no way a trickle down effect. Am I getting that right? Illuminati -> Bankers -> CEO's -> Multimillionaires -> ordinary folk -> Lowerclass -> Homeless You want money to go to the ordinary folk right? They will create more jobs, because they spend the money, the create the cash flow and... Ok that still sounds like the lower class are hosed. My friend, you can call me incompetent all you want. I believe you have spent much time mulling over your ideas, like anyone who gives a damn about politics. However the conclusions you reached, that you feel are obvious, may be flawed in some rather significant ways. You may be making Logical jumps I am unwilling to make. It is not obvious how this strategy of pooling money into an arbitrary bracket of our respective cultures will improve the lives of anyone but that arbitrary bracket. You have failed to convince me. Two options then, try again as I remain receptive to these ideas. Or not.