His point is simply that believing in a mother and father being the best environment for a child can be interpreted as being against (or less in favor of) an en

His point is simply that believing in a mother and father being the best environment for a child can be interpreted as being against (or less in favor of) an environment with two parents that are in a same sex relationship (i.e. homophobic) or it can be interpreted as being against (or less in favor of) an environment with a single parent. But actually, all you are saying is that you believe the ideal environment for a child is a mother and father, presumably living together. At any rate, even if you were expressing homophobia, it isn't necessarily hate speech. Saying that it's a good idea to burn homosexuals is. Out of curiosity, do you believe that living with two same sex parents in a healthy relationship is better than a mother and father in an abusive relationship?