3 ms·
> You will notice the significantly greater fluidity Its the law of diminishing returns. When I had 30Hz and 60Hz monitor on the same desktop (as in I could
by Amadou 13y ago
> You will notice the significantly greater fluidity
Its the law of diminishing returns. When I had 30Hz and 60Hz monitor on the same desktop (as in I could drag windows from one monitor to the other) it was barely noticeable and not at all distracting.
> Sports, news, and daytime dramas (yarg) are typically 50Hz or 60Hz
That's interlaced. So 60 fields per second but only 30 frames per second. You can make an argument that proper de-interlacing requires a 60hz display but in practice its only the kind of thing that videophiles will notice.
> watching a 24Hz movie on a 30Hz monitor will make for a terribly juddery experience.
The seiki also accepts 24hz at 4K, and will even go as high as 120Hz if you feed it the right 1080p signal (the upscaling will look like crap though). You just need to fiddle the PC's display settings as needed.
- nitrogen 13y agoIts the law of diminishing returns. When I had 30Hz and 60Hz monitor on the same desktop (as in I could drag windows from one monitor to the other) it was barely noticeable and not at all distracting. Maybe different people are more or less sensitive, but after seeing a friend's 120Hz monitor, once I can afford to upgrade my primary display to a nice 120Hz screen I'll never go back. I have a very low tolerance for latency and jitter. That's interlaced. So 60 fields per second but only 30 frames per second. You can make an argument that proper de-interlacing requires a 60hz display but in practice its only the kind of thing that videophiles will notice. Not necessarily; AFAIK some stations might still broadcast in 720p60. I think most people will notice that the athletes seem to be "moving slower" if 60i is deinterlaced to 30p, they just won't have the vocabulary to describe it.