> I think they'd favor the candidate/party who would educate their children. Coercing other people to provide education is not the right thing to do. There ar

> I think they'd favor the candidate/party who would educate their children. Coercing other people to provide education is not the right thing to do. There are other economically reasonable ways of providing education that don't infringe rights. A nice side effect is that a market for education would, in the long run, commoditize high-quality, affordable education. The market has worked well in every industry that has remained a reasonably free market. The US K-12 education system is currently pretty bad except in well-to-do areas, and higher education is a massive bubble. After all, isn't not stealing the first thing we ought to be teaching our children?