3 ms·
yes but the recommended approach is to put CloudFront in front of it, if you care about performance at all
by philfreo 13y ago
yes but the recommended approach is to put CloudFront in front of it, if you care about performance at all
- res0nat0r 13y agoI think the point of their post, is that this is their "oh shit we are down" setup, which will consist of a small static site that S3 will happily serve up to anyone anywhere in the world very quickly. This isn't meant to be a full wack highly performant copy of their existing website fronted by CDN's.