3 ms·

If you're paying for it, then there is an incentive for the company to give you the service other than profiteering on your data. Obviously it's still not a gu

• vog 13y ago
  Where should this incentive come from? There are lots of companies that simply sell you the serive and at the same time profiteering on your data. Unless, of course, privacy is part of that service, but even then the company isn't trustworth unless it actively encourages use of end-to-end encryption wherever feasible.
  • throwaway1979 13y ago
    Case in point: duckduckgo
  • muyuu 13y ago
    I think you missed the part where I said that it's not a guarantee. Obviously, it's not a guarantee. They can still profit both ways. But if they have another means of profit, then there is the possibility that they're not dead set on profiteering on your data. This is still not good enough for me though. Self-hosted or nothing as far as I'm concerned (Social Networks).
    • SamWhited 13y ago
      muyuu: Absolutely right (although, depending on the social network and how federation is handled they could possibly sell your data even if it's self hosted). If you know of any other good self-hosted social networks I'd love to hear about them. Feel free to email me; I may or may not see it in the deluge of comments here (see the about page on my blog).