Google scholar page for the paper: http://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=9ZMoj9IAAAAJ&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=9ZMoj9IAAA

Google scholar page for the paper: http://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=9ZMoj9IAAAAJ&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=9ZMoj9IAAAAJ:UebtZRa9Y70C http://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl... Direct link to PDF: http://paginaspersonales.deusto.es/claorden/publications/2012/Laorden_2012_CISIS_Negobot.pdf http://paginaspersonales.deusto.es/claorden/publications/201... The quality of the research, and that's my own opinion, leaves very much to be desired (many fuzzy assumptions, a lot of hand waving & of the "and then, magic happens" syndrome). This wasn't published at an ACM or IEEE conference, which is typically a first warning sign. Sadly, the BBC (and other major media outlets, but it's the 2nd time I observe it with the BBC website this month) has a knack for taking academic papers from a year ago (or more), and writing subpar articles about it.