3 ms·
It's funny, isn't it? We gave out more domains to speed things up, but now it slows us down (referring to your link). I would highlight that HTTP 2 > SPDY as f
by lstamour 13y ago
It's funny, isn't it? We gave out more domains to speed things up, but now it slows us down (referring to your link).
I would highlight that HTTP 2 > SPDY as far as standards go, and the "beta" protocol of SPDY is already at 55% market share including IE 11: http://caniuse.com/spdy http://caniuse.com/spdy
For those who are interested in speed optimization for 2013 and beyond, plus why SPDY's faster-than-SSL descendants are crucial to the web's success, have a look at http://www.igvita.com/slides/2013/breaking-1s-mobile-barrier.pdf http://www.igvita.com/slides/2013/breaking-1s-mobile-barrier... -- I believe there's a video out there too somewhere. Edit: Video link is on first page of the slides.
What's interesting too is that this talk focuses as much on what's achievable without SPDY as what might be with, down the road. We really need faster SSL negotiation for that first time connection cost.