3 ms·
Apparently they dont do any code reviews, QA, etc? I always find it interesting when things like this "slip" through... If they used SVN of GIT wouldn't other
by jason_slack 13y ago
Apparently they dont do any code reviews, QA, etc? I always find it interesting when things like this "slip" through...
If they used SVN of GIT wouldn't other developers have noticed files changing and reviewed the changes others are making?
- jleehey 13y agoI thought the same thing. How much code would it take to set up this mining operation? It seems unlikely that the amount of code added is trivial enough to go undetected.
- qwertzlcoatl 13y agoThere is a conspiracy theory going around regarding this issue being orchestrated collectively by the ESEA admins. This theory comes from several really weird statements from ESEA admin ipkane, made months before the Bitcoin mining was implemented.
- jenrzzz 13y agoYou might be assuming too much of them. ESEA's client is barely hacked together and, like most other anti-cheat software, uses some nasty methods to detect cheating. I wouldn't be surprised if their other development processes reflect on that.
- magal 13y agoI came to say exactly this. No code reviews, no source control. Pretty scary.
- jason_slack 13y agoScary at the least. I guess we dont know the whole story. Was it just 1 guy, a group of guys? Wow.