> in a statement to reporters she essentially said she thought Apple was guilty before hearing any evidence Are you talking about this[1]? The statement wasn't

> in a statement to reporters she essentially said she thought Apple was guilty before hearing any evidence Are you talking about this[1]? The statement wasn't to reporters. It was a tentative in-court statement in response to an inquiry by one of the lawyers. Hardly the basis for a serious accusation of misconduct against a federal judge. [1] http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/23/us-usa-apple-ebooks-idUSBRE94M19A20130523 http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/23/us-usa-apple-ebook...