4 ms·
> I.e. a competition to Facebook. Since when has Facebook been the backend for interaction across Facebook's services? That's nonsense. The closest Google+ ge
by hahainternet 13y ago
> I.e. a competition to Facebook.
Since when has Facebook been the backend for interaction across Facebook's services? That's nonsense.
The closest Google+ gets to Facebook is that they both allow you to share content between friends. Google wants it to be the backend to the various features like Maps, Search, Mail. Facebook on the other hand wants to be the frontend, the site that you go to.
If I can't convince you then I'm really not bothered, Google have made it very clear what they're doing and why they're doing it. Perhaps view some of the session videos from IO.
- brazzy 13y ago> Google wants it to be the backend to the various features like Maps, Search, Mail. Facebook on the other hand wants to be the frontend, the site that you go to. When Google cancels the separate service and folds it into G+, as with Latitude, as with Reader, then it becomes the frontend as well. I fail to see a substantial difference. > Google have made it very clear what they're doing and why they're doing it. Perhaps view some of the session videos from IO. Perhaps start entertaining the notion that what people say they do (and especially why) isn't necessarily what they do (and especially why).