4 ms·
Valve is really not a slow company. I've heard this expressed before and never really seen it. Please see this list of IP developed by valve: http://en.wikiped
by nemof 13y ago
Valve is really not a slow company. I've heard this expressed before and never really seen it. Please see this list of IP developed by valve:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valve_Corporation#Games http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valve_Corporation#Games
That's not an insubstantial amount of games for one company.
This doesn't even take into consideration that they currently run the biggest online games store in the world which is a huge undertaking, and all the moonshot developments they have running that might not even see the light of day.
Valve are not a slow company. They're a savvy company. It's hardly surprising that they don't really have a flat power-structure, but they do seem to have some kind of structure that allows them to continue to innovate in a variety of areas.
- mariusmg 13y agoThe only significant game they did since 2007 is Portal 2. (1 game in 6 years). Left for Dead was acquired and the sequel was done basically by the same team. Valve has Steam and, with it, a very nice income stream (they're basically rich). While they do try stuff with F2P (dota, tf) personally i doubt Valve is a top tier game maker anymore. It seems to me they don't have the ambition anymore and live the good life while Steam provides.
- Negitivefrags 13y agoDota 2 is the #5 PC game being played right now according to Xfire and is only growing. It's pretty unreasonable to call it insignificant.
- bane 13y agoIIR, DOTA was a mod for Warcraft III, and Valve hired the mod team on to build the sequel based on Source. from WP "According to Valve's founder and managing director, Gabe Newell, the company's investment in Dota was sparked from the collective interest of several veteran employees, including Team Fortress designer Robin Walker, programmer Adrian Finol and project manager Erik Johnson, all of whom had attempted to partake in team play at a competitive level." So it might be a popular game, but it's not a major development for Valve in the sense that Team Fortress, Portal 2 or HF2 was...and also demonstrates some of the internal culture issues Valve has.
- sillysaurus 13y agoPopular = profitable. This equation governs the gaming industry. In the case of Dota 2, the game is bringing in millions via the in-game store. The game has 200k active players at any given time, and they're well on the way to 1mil active players in a few years. A significant portion of those players are buying tournament tickets. Most of them are buying custom equipment like couriers, announcer packs, etc. Dota 2 will be the most lucrative Valve project since Steam. To call it insignificant is to be short-sighted. If you still think the MOBA genre is insignificant, then perhaps this infographic will offer some perspective: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2012/10/12/league-of-legends-bigger-than-wow-more-daily-players-than-call-of-duty/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2012/10/12/league... Source: I worked in the MOBA genre.
- stonemetal 13y agobut it's not a major development What do you consider a major development? Sure they hired the team behind the original but they still developed the game and put it out with company resources.
- mccr8 13y agoTeam Fortress was a mod for Quake, and Valve hired the mod team to build the sequel based on Source. That doesn't make it less of a major development.
- wasd 13y agoWasn't it a mod for half life 1 (team fortress classic)?
- Kelet 13y agoTeam Fortress Classic is based on Team Fortress which was a Quake mod. In 1999, Valve hired the Team Fortress Quake modders to port their game to the GoldSrc (HL1) engine.
- jholman 13y agoHeh. What do you think "classic" means when it's part of the title of a product? It means that it's a derivative of something else, and wants to capture some reflected glory. Don't go thinking that "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein", the 1994 movie, is the original. Team Fortress was a mod for Quake before HL1 was a twinkle in Gaben's eye. TFC was someone saying "that sure was a fun gameplay mode, but I can't get anyone to load Q1 any more... maybe I'll recreate the same thing over again"
- nemof 13y agoI think the lesson here is that people should stop just thinking of Valve as just a games company. And as has been noted below, dota is an insane money maker. Add to that, tf2 is now self funded through people making virtual hats. This isn't the signs of a company sitting on its laurels. Can Valve make the next episode of Half Life as well as Naughty Dog might? Probably not. I can understand where you're coming from, but still think that if you look at the pile of games they've made, add in steam, the f2p systems they're developing and moonshots like the steambox etc, you find a company both involved and agile, not slow and monolithic. But that's just, like, my opinion!