4 ms·
> I am not paying for the 0.1 dollar that the coffee actually costs to make, I am paying for a place to sit true > I am paying for a place to sit as well and
by noptic 13y ago
> I am not paying for the 0.1 dollar that the coffee actually costs to make, I am paying for a place to sit
true
> I am paying for a place to sit as well and do something with my time. Be it 10 minutes or 3 hours
3 hours for 6$. This is 2$ an hour for your table. At this rate the coffeshop is loosing money.
It all boils down to the question:
Do you really think this is fair?
- ekianjo 13y ago> Do you really think this is fair? It's not for me to decide. Last I know, the coffee shop is still making tons of money, and that system works for them as well.
- sigkill 13y agoYou're basically saying "I know it's not fair, but screw you I got mine." You're not being asked to decide on a corporate policy that you need to weasel out with such statements. The god damn question is simple, "Do you think this is fair?"
- ekianjo 13y agoPersonally I don't see any difference between this and paying for a train ticket and being unable to sit during the journey. So yeah, I think it's fair. Whoever comes first gets the seat, and keeps the sit if they want to. It's not like you are renting the seat per x minutes or something. When you are in park do you bitch about people sitting on benches for too long?
- sigkill 13y ago>So yeah, I think it's fair. I'm not asking for justification. You think it's fair, and I respect you for that. I may have a different opinion, and that's fine too! It's just that it seems dishonest to deflect a question like the politicians do.
- noptic 13y agoNot yet. But nice people like you might change that. BTW: Where do I get a 3 hour train ride for 3$ ;)
- noptic 13y agoWell the topic of this article is that it is not working out for many coffe shops...
- ekianjo 13y agoWell it's probably that they have other issues to figure out, because it's working damn well for Starbucks.