I frequently see people talking about an unqualified "100% test coverage". Is it safe to assume in these cases that the author is referring to statement coverag

I frequently see people talking about an unqualified "100% test coverage". Is it safe to assume in these cases that the author is referring to statement coverage[1] rather than something more stringent like decision coverage or even MC/DC?[2] If we're talking about statement coverage then I agree that achieving 100% statement coverage then calling it a day really isn't as helpful as it might sound. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_coverage#Basic_coverage_criteria https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_coverage#Basic_coverage_c... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_coverage#Modified_condition.2Fdecision_coverage https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_coverage#Modified_conditi...