3 ms·
I'd imagine this is similar to "internal" in C#. If so, that still doesn't equate to being private, as other objects can see them within the package/assembly. T
by prawks 13y ago
I'd imagine this is similar to "internal" in C#. If so, that still doesn't equate to being private, as other objects can see them within the package/assembly. To the outside world this is fine, of course, however it removes that additional organizational capability within the package.
- ghswa 13y agoSolving this surely requires explicit support for testing at the language level, eg. a "private testable" scope.