Yes, the crypto identity aspect goes some way to address Sybil like problems. Regarding anonymity: you're only as anonymous as your association with your publi

Yes, the crypto identity aspect goes some way to address Sybil like problems. Regarding anonymity: you're only as anonymous as your association with your public key[s]. Given that items (k/v pairs) stored in the DHT are self-contained in terms of proving provenance it doesn't matter from what node they originate. Put plainly, there is no need for a node id (a SHA512) to be linked to a specific user (identified by their public key). I explain how signing items works here: http://ntoll.org/article/drogulus-questions-and-clarifications http://ntoll.org/article/drogulus-questions-and-clarificatio... For me, the most curious fact about the drogulus is that it is a ubiquitous ecosystem for asynchronously processing Logos code and data. If you see the implication of this then you'll get where I'm trying to go with the drogulus. :-)