4 ms·
Sure but the author(s) of Cryptocat have been so uniquely resistant to help/input, over a fairly long period of time. Maybe your euphemism 'unserious' is worth
by glurgh 13y ago
Sure but the author(s) of Cryptocat have been so uniquely resistant to help/input, over a fairly long period of time. Maybe your euphemism 'unserious' is worth adopting for every time one wants to say 'bad' or 'incompetent', in cases like this.
- tptacek 13y agoI think the project is worth criticizing, but that the concerns are serious enough to deserve better than snark.
- glurgh 13y agoMaybe at some point a project exhausts whatever potential goodwill/snarklessness is available and just becomes an object of snark - and at that point and beyond, perhaps the benefits of the project having a reputation of being a snarkmagnet outweigh negatives of the inevitable snark it generates. Makes it a lousy, toxic topic for message boards but that seems a comparatively small price for a defense against the notion that Cryptocat is (or likely, ever will be) secure.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]