3 ms·
> it was nominally communist. Not just nominally. It went down the list of the Communist Manifesto and implemented things, and it wound up with Stalin.
by derleth 13y ago
> it was nominally communist.
Not just nominally. It went down the list of the Communist Manifesto and implemented things, and it wound up with Stalin.
- ThomPete 13y agoBy that logic. All makers of bread knifes and hammers are responsible for murders being done with them.
- derleth 13y agoIn your mind, has Communism ever been responsible for bad things happening? Could I prove to you, even in theory, that Communism has bad outcomes? What kind of evidence would I need?
- mehwoot 13y agoWoah, I didn't know when one thing preceded another that it is certain that thing caused the other. Thanks for opening my eyes.
- derleth 13y agoIn your mind, has Communism ever been responsible for bad things happening? Could I prove to you, even in theory, that Communism has bad outcomes? What kind of evidence would I need?