Perhaps these will whet your appetite… http://www.shmoo.com/mail/bugtraq/sep99/msg00145.html http://www.shmoo.com/mail/bugtraq/sep99/msg00145.html https://web

Perhaps these will whet your appetite… http://www.shmoo.com/mail/bugtraq/sep99/msg00145.html http://www.shmoo.com/mail/bugtraq/sep99/msg00145.html https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2003-0063 https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2003-00... Also here is an overview of some of the possible ways things can go wrong: http://lists.kde.org/?l=konsole-devel&m=104617524910254&w=2 http://lists.kde.org/?l=konsole-devel&m=104617524910254&w=2 The entire concept of exploiting a terminal by supplying hostile input has been around for over 10 years now. Unix veterans and BBS users have been exposed to this type of problem since the very beginning, a newsgroup search can turn up all sorts of exploits, from the ever-popular "flash" program to the abuse of logging features in xterm which were disabled in R5