It seems more like the difference between "reporting" and "science" to me. If you're interested in the science, consider reading the linked research paper inste

It seems more like the difference between "reporting" and "science" to me. If you're interested in the science, consider reading the linked research paper instead[0]. It may adopt something closer to the tone you're looking for. FWIW, I agree that Bayesian statistics strikes me as regrettably underused in modern social science. But it's my impression that scientists of many stripes continue to use classical statistics instead, so calling something that doesn't use Bayes "not science" seems a bit off. [0] http://www.socialemotions.org/page5/files/Condon.etal.2013.pdf http://www.socialemotions.org/page5/files/Condon.etal.2013.p...