4 ms·
Unless you're sitting within 7 feet of a 70" screen 4k is completely pointless: http://carltonbale.com/1080p-does-matter/ http://carltonbale.com/1080p-does-mat
by AndrewDucker 13y ago
Unless you're sitting within 7 feet of a 70" screen 4k is completely pointless:
http://carltonbale.com/1080p-does-matter/ http://carltonbale.com/1080p-does-matter/
- sliverstorm 13y agoTHANK YOU. We might see 4k screens take off for computers, but they don't make sense for TVs right now.
- AndrewDucker 13y agoYeah, my 22" monitor is 1680x1050 - which http://isthisretina.com/ http://isthisretina.com/ tells me is retina at 38". As it happens, I'm sitting about 26" from it - so I need about 50% more pixel depth. Even then, that only makes it 50% of 4K resolution. A 4k screen at 22" is a retina display at 17". That doesn't sound comfortable - although I haven't played with an Oculus Rift yet...
- DanBC 13y agoAnd yet people still buy gold plated HDMI cables.
- sixothree 13y ago10 feet away from a 90" screen is what many people with projectors currently enjoy.
- sukuriant 13y agoHaving gone in to see one of the screens, I believe it was less than that from a 60+" screen that I could tell the difference. Go to a store, e.g. Best Buy, and see. Obviously, the people with the standard 37-50" screens aren't going to see much of a change; but when you get large screens, it's pretty clear