25 ms·
This is 3.5-year-old random-guy-on-zdnet commentary on a single quote from an unnamed source taken from this article[1], and the quote doesn't remotely support
by magicalist 13y ago
This is 3.5-year-old random-guy-on-zdnet commentary on a single quote from an unnamed source taken from this article[1], and the quote doesn't remotely support the conclusions he makes.
Here is a much more recent report on what likely actually went down: http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/05/chinese-hackers-who-breached-google-reportedly-targeted-classified-data/ http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/05/chinese-hackers-who-...
tl;dr: it's speculated that they were interested in who the US government was watching as any overlap with their own operatives meant that they were likely compromised.
[1] http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9144221/Google_attack_part_of_widespread_spying_effort http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9144221/Google_attack...?