4 ms·
This is just describes another transitional point in human history. In any given year, we can produce the same output with less labor. As this effect compounds,
by kenster07 13y ago
This is just describes another transitional point in human history. In any given year, we can produce the same output with less labor. As this effect compounds, take this pattern to its extreme -- producing all the output the world could ever need with virtually no human labor. In such a scenario, what is the meaning of a wage? What does it mean for a person to produce "value?" How would humanity, whose genome has been shaped under the chisel of scarcity, adapt to a system where such a thing did not exist?
In this thought experiment, I believe it becomes evident that the laws of economics, as we understand them, are NOT timeless. Modern economics has gone on a tangent, creating a system of analysis and theory that only works for this microcosm in our existence. It is only as our economy approaches the scenario described above that the true laws of human economics can become evident.
- userulluipeste 13y agoNot every part of human labor/involvement will be totally replaced (if your imagination needs a hint, think about the oldest occupation if the world). There are services that rely on human interaction and as the world evolves the demand for such specific social-involved activities will continuously diversify itself. I also think that the access to the limited resources (think of space if nothing else) will always maintain in a way or another a scarcity-based system.
- kenster07 13y agoYou never know. I think the frailty of the human ego is more likely to manufacture scarcity than anything else.