3 ms·
Well that's the joke. They can construe, manipulate and torque that to mean whatever they want or rather the lack of whatever they want.
by ryanSrich 13y ago
Well that's the joke.
They can construe, manipulate and torque that to mean whatever they want or rather the lack of whatever they want.
- wdewind 13y agoNo they can't. It's pretty defined actually. A really simplified way to understand it is: the police have specifically said "we will protect $PERSON from $THREAT." Take for instance a hypothetical domestic violence case. Say the victim reports an incident, and then is later murdered. Because the victim reported the first incident does not imply a special relationship under the law. But, if the police told the victim specifically that they would protect him/her from the alleged perpetrator of the crime and then another crime occurs they would be liable. This is why you very rarely would find an officer promising protection: it creates that special relationship. For more info check out this source: http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_arch&article_id=1172&issue_id=52007 http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseac...
- gohrt 13y ago> This is why you very rarely would find an officer promising protection: Then we must update the motto: <strike>protect and</strike> serve.