4 ms·
Consider it from the position of somebody in "upper management". 1. Technology lets a NSA employee do orders of magnitude more work than a Stasi employee. 2.
by beloch 13y ago
Consider it from the position of somebody in "upper management".
1. Technology lets a NSA employee do orders of magnitude more work than a Stasi employee.
2. Every employee may be a traitor or merely overly ambitious, but gains knowledge of how to evade detection while obtaining privileged information and taking advantage of it as a side-effect of working for you. As your organization grows you have to spend a lot of resources on internal policing.
3. Fewer employees also means fewer potential whistle-blowers.
Even without budgetary constraints, the NSA is well motivated to employ a much smaller percentage of the population than the Stasi did, assuming they are equally invasive. The ideal they are probably striving for is a completely automated NSA that reports only to the glorious leader.
- frozenport 13y agoIt is certainly well motivated. I wanted to highlight the difficulty the Easter Germans face when considering that 3% of the their population was actively spying on the other portion. Not to mention the large number of people who had something nasty to say about their neighbor.
- VladRussian2 13y ago>only to the glorious leader while glorious leader sounds good too, after watching "Dictator" allow me to correct you - it is "supreme leader". Btw, the supreme leader suggested that US could have been able to spy on its citizens if US were a dictatorship instead of democracy. :)