4 ms·
When part of your system becomes flawed (part or whole), the whole can be attacked. Thus, adding more deterministic behavior doesn't add more randomness (i.e.
by cdumler 13y ago
When part of your system becomes flawed (part or whole), the whole can be attacked. Thus, adding more deterministic behavior doesn't add more randomness (i.e. more safety). Generally, when crypto falls down, it falls somewhat gracefully (i.e. there are a class of known attacks under certain particular situations.) As Crypto is an on-going war between those creating the security and those trying to break it, expect to have to change your crypto over time.
- contingencies 13y ago> When part of your system becomes flawed (part or whole), the whole can be attacked. This is the most concise and meaningful argument against the proposed approach thus far. Hats off.