Interesting. That is actually an argument to leave the overhead chart as-is (possibly renamed) but change the latency chart to a "higher is better" chart in so

Interesting. That is actually an argument to leave the overhead chart as-is (possibly renamed) but change the latency chart to a "higher is better" chart in some way. I don't disagree that a single convention would be preferable, but it would be unusual to represent latency in a higher-is-better fashion. Thanks all for the input here!