I don't need to "want that time not to have been in vain", I am already developing with Haskell and reaching extremely high productivity levels. What I want is

I don't need to "want that time not to have been in vain", I am already developing with Haskell and reaching extremely high productivity levels. What I want is for people to spend less time improving the eco systems of poorly designed languages that repeat past mistakes. Go is more dynamically typed than Haskell. It isn't a 0/1 thing. Parameteric polymorphism is dynamically typed in Go. Nullability is dynamically typed in Go. These are huge parts of the languages. Instead of engaging in a discussion, you're repeating mistakes in a condescending tone. Your last part of the comment is only appropriately responded by "You are giving the Go community a bad image by pounding me with ignorance with every reply, I kindly request that you study the matter before replying further".