4 ms·
As others have mentioned, it was really quite confusing to see "higher is better" and then "lower is better" in the same set of graphs. Stick with one conventio
by lstamour 13y ago
As others have mentioned, it was really quite confusing to see "higher is better" and then "lower is better" in the same set of graphs. Stick with one convention. It works. :)
- bhauer 13y agoInteresting. That is actually an argument to leave the overhead chart as-is (possibly renamed) but change the latency chart to a "higher is better" chart in some way. I don't disagree that a single convention would be preferable, but it would be unusual to represent latency in a higher-is-better fashion. Thanks all for the input here!