4 ms·
Sadly, I think it comes down to simple economics. The marginal costs to a restaurant of a small amount of additional food on your plate is minimal. The downsid
by jsdalton 17y ago
Sadly, I think it comes down to simple economics.
The marginal costs to a restaurant of a small amount of additional food on your plate is minimal. The downsides aren't that great either...assuming the price to the customer of a bit of extra food is the same, the people who want extra food will be happy, and those that don't just don't have to eat it.
Now ask that same restaurant to start serving smaller portions, in comparison with their competition. They haven't really cut too much in costs, but suddenly they're the guys with wimpy portion sizes, while the restaurant next door serves up a full, satisfying meal.
I think we're just seeing the result of a market that's catering to the unfortunate preferences of us, the consumers.
- davidw 17y agoYeah, restaurants/grocery stores definitely compete more on quantity than quality, at least for some things, in the US, than in "Europe" (meaning that corner of Europe that I'm familiar with), where people will discriminate amongst products and buy the better ones.
- tomjen 17y agoThat might very well be true, but then there should be a small number of slightly (but not all that much) more expensive restaurants, that will rather focus on a bit of upscale food.