3 ms·
1.) UI is confusing. Not immediately clear what's a button. 2.) Not UI feedback, but the data seems pretty sparse. Getting not found on relatively common sizes
by incision 13y ago
1.) UI is confusing. Not immediately clear what's a button.
2.) Not UI feedback, but the data seems pretty sparse. Getting not found on relatively common sizes.
3.) I'd wager the average person has no idea about width, profile and size. You really need a way to search by make/model/year for something like this or at least a quick guide on how to read the sidewall to get the information.
4.) I'd be more interested in the type of tire (all-season, snow, sport) than the make or source website at the second step.
5.) Tires are probably not the best thing to sell via a minimally visual site. There's a reason sites like tirerack have gone to the trouble to provide tools to simulate what tire/wheel combos will look like on a specific make/model/year/color of car.
People care about what their vehicles look like, right down to the tires.
- kcorbitt 13y agore: 1.) Among other things, a good practice for indicating something is clickable is to set the cursor: pointer css property. Also, it'd be nice if the text were centered vertically. Since your "li"s are all a fixed height you can do this easily without relying on table hacks or css3 by simply setting the padding-top to 20px and adjusting height accordingly. (Box-align will eventually support this, but you still can't count on people having compatible browsers so for a simple layout like this one padding should do just fine).
- hamburglar 13y agoDon't rely on cursor alone unless you want confused mobile users...
- rodolphoarruda 13y ago> 1.) UI is confusing. Not immediately clear what's a button. Interesting. I found it very clear/easy. I read this text as soon as the page loaded: "Please enter your tyre dimensions by clicking on the boxes below. e.g 205/45 17"; so I just clicked the boxes according to my own car tire's dimensions.