3 ms·
This seems like a decent, helpful comment to me. Don't know why it received two vitriolic replies.
by tome 13y ago
This seems like a decent, helpful comment to me. Don't know why it received two vitriolic replies.
- TylerE 13y agoBecause it's completely factually wrong. Go is not AT ALL dynamically typed.
- Peaker 13y agoGo is more dynamically typed than Haskell. That is, it leaves nullability to runtime. It leaves parameteric polymorphism to runtime. Whenever there's a static type that Go cannot express (and there are plenty of those!) it is effectively dynamically typed about that property.
- tome 13y agoRight, Go doesn't have sum types for example. (Or at least, it didn't. Does it now?)