3 ms·
"Seizure" comes to mind, though. Those data are seized. Either they are 'mine' or they are 'Google's' but they certainly are not 'public'. In any of both cases
by pfortuny 13y ago
"Seizure" comes to mind, though.
Those data are seized. Either they are 'mine' or they are 'Google's' but they certainly are not 'public'. In any of both cases, it is unreasonable to seizure them (even if what you get is just a copy) arbitrarily.
- rayiner 13y agoBut the amendment doesn't talk in terms of "not public." It refers to "their... effects." Words aren't meaningless. To make a case for protection under the 4th, you have to make a case that something is your paper or effect, not Google's, and not just anything that is "not public."
- pfortuny 13y agoYou're right. AFAIK I keep ownership of my data when using Google's resources, now that I think of it.