> For example, maybe they admit it, plus there is authenticated video + eyewitness + whatever you like evidence that they did it. Then that would be good enoug

> For example, maybe they admit it, plus there is authenticated video + eyewitness + whatever you like evidence that they did it. Then that would be good enough to convince a jury the accused is guilty. You can't allow the defence to just claim "well, he did it", as you appear to desire, because that's ripe for abuse.