I find his articles really hard to read, here are 5 simple reasons:- > Wordpress exists. You don't need to be a maker to use something like this, anyone with

I find his articles really hard to read, here are 5 simple reasons:- > Wordpress exists. You don't need to be a maker to use something like this, anyone with the motivation can. > It's faddish, the mention of nodeJS as a requirment has me rolling my eyes into my fucking brain. > Actually, most important content is decentralized. If facebook died tomorrow, there would be some value lost, but it'd be hardly the end of the internet. > "We're going distributed". Why? Because you woke up one morning and decided? Because you've gave it some thought? > He doesn't seem interested in what we'll lose when we're decentralized. Does he understand the drawbacks? There is some really good content on HN, loads of it, but this really isn't it and I'm not saying that because I disagree I think the internet should be a series of peer nodes like it was first designed to be. However, I don't think we need a self appointed spokes persons to achieve this, it's already there, and if you want to discuss decentralizing major services like facebook, I'd like to see, on a tech site, someone with a technical solution that attempts to mitigate what we'd lose.