2 ms·
Well, a couple of things. One, considering the national divorce rate, wedlock doesn't mean quite as much as it used to: had both of your couples married, stati
by saraid216 13y ago
Well, a couple of things.
One, considering the national divorce rate, wedlock doesn't mean quite as much as it used to: had both of your couples married, statistically, we'd expect one pair to divorce anyways. Two, they may have opted for a private wedding sans name change you weren't invited to. Not likely.. but possible. Three, sometimes the other person dies. They might enlist; they might get gunned down in a drive-by; they might develop cancer; etc. Is it the "wrong guy" if you have kids with someone who happened to be working in the WTC on 9/11?
Single parenthood just isn't hard to come by, especially in our hyper-individualized age where the notion of children being raised by a village is regarded as a hippie thing. In the grand scheme, wedlock is a relatively flimsy shelter against the storm of reality... but I agree that it's definitely a shelter.
- lostlogin 13y agoJust incase it interests anyone, New Zealand has competed its census. >>A total of 8785 married couples divorced - about 10.1 divorces for every 1000 estimated existing marriages - and just over one-third (35 per cent) of couples who married in 1987 had divorced before their silver wedding anniversary.<< http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10894877 http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=...
- saraid216 13y agoThere's more data here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce_demography http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce_demography Though their New Zealand data is outdated.