4 ms·
How can "a lot" of a group be "purely" both "self-interested" and "idiots"? I do not think this statement can be anything more than rhetoric and schoolyard name
by spikels 13y ago
How can "a lot" of a group be "purely" both "self-interested" and "idiots"? I do not think this statement can be anything more than rhetoric and schoolyard name calling.
I would say people have a strong interest in themselves and their personal welfare. This should be expected or we would probably not exist as a species. However the interesting thing about humans and some other intelligent animals is that they are also interested in the welfare of others, including non-relations, and even other species (some argue that this is part of a broader form of self-interest like the golden rule). However none of this should deny that people are motivated by self-interest most of the time.
While libertarians talk about self-interest more than most I don't think there is any good evidence that their actions are any more selfish than non-libertarians. I would suggest they are simply making an observation about human nature that explains a huge fraction of human behavior.
- jshen 13y agothat's a quote from the person I was replying to. "However none of this should deny that people are motivated by self-interest most of the time." Sure, but that doesn't mean we should build a philosophy and our institutions around the idea that it's good! This is very different than "simply making an observation about human nature". And the biggest flaw in libertarianism is the idea that humans make logical decisions, which is one of the most egregious denials of human nature I've ever seen.
- penrod 13y agoAnd the biggest flaw in contemporary liberalism is the idea that these very obvious flaws in human nature are somehow transcended by the humans we elect to office.