3 ms·
Whilst there may still be plenty of scope for error, I think there is a large difference between using CryptoJS and "rolling your own". I wonder how "correct"
by amouat 13y ago
Whilst there may still be plenty of scope for error, I think there is a large difference between using CryptoJS and "rolling your own".
I wonder how "correct" CryptoJS itself is though.
- networked 13y ago> Whilst there may still be plenty of scope for error, I think there is a large difference between using CryptoJS and "rolling your own". I agree to some extent but as the article we're commenting on proves, the scope for error is enough for you to render your encryption useless against an attacker armed with just a modern desktop PC.