3 ms·
I think that he meant the deployment section in his post was naive, not yours :). I appreciate the compare and contrast.
by johnbellone 13y ago
I think that he meant the deployment section in his post was naive, not yours :).
I appreciate the compare and contrast.
- FooBarWidget 13y agoI know, that's I meant too. :) I meant to ask, what was naive about his deployment section? Perhaps he meant putting Puma directly on port 80. Although I usually wouldn't do that, I am not entirely sure whether one shouldn't do that. For example Unicorn is multi-proces single-threaded so it should never be used without a buffering web server, but Puma is different. We'll need the Puma author to make a statement about this. I'm glad the comparison was useful to you. :)