6 ms·
Probably not: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4768008 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4768008. Still, don't be a tool.
by JoachimSchipper 13y ago
Probably not: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4768008 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4768008.
Still, don't be a tool.
- angersock 13y agoInteresting advice. As for being a tool, well, it wasn't an awful question. For what it's worth I never worked with them either.
- tptacek 13y agoIt is an awful question. It assumes bad faith on the part of the commenter. It's extraordinarily rude.
- wavefunction 13y agoResponding like this is preferable to calling someone else a tool.
- tptacek 13y agoI'm glad you approve. No, wait, I don't give a shit. HN has too much tolerance for this 1000% totally bogus intellectually insulting rhetorical tactic. It demeans everyone. The people writing these idiotic "you must be a shill for {Microsoft,Mozilla,NSA}" comments think they're clever, but what they're really saying is "not only do I not understand what the Fundamental Attribution Error is, but I can't even comprehend the idea of someone disagreeing with me or even presenting a fact or idea that challenges my preconceptions; no, it's much more likely that this is a bad faith comment than that I don't know everything there is to know about every topic". And then other people cheer them on! There is no online community anywhere on the Internet less capable of spotting a shill than Hacker News. Any competent shill could immediately see how to game the site.
- wavefunction 13y agoHeh. I wasn't offering my approval so don't go jumping the gun there and assuming things. I was just offering a perspective on effective methods of communication. Whether it means anything to anyone other than myself, it has no effect on my continued meager offerings in the future. Anyways...
- angersock 13y agoI'm not sure I would've interpreted it that way were I in your position, but fair enough.