3 ms·
Hi guys, Thanks for your comments!! @Janzert - About the first image, sorry about that, I have just changed to a gif image, now it should be a few kb, thanks
by albertoG 17y ago
Hi guys,
Thanks for your comments!!
@Janzert - About the first image, sorry about that, I have just changed to a gif image, now it should be a few kb, thanks for that.
@jhancock - You are right to mention that there is no comment on how to measure any of the vertex, that´s the tricky part, I am going to evolve the idea in future posts and I hope I will be able to provide with some ideas, anyway I think the most important thing is to have in mind the pyramid when developing
@silentbicycle - Sorry if my post is short, I just wanted to share this idea and as I like the articles that are very lean I thought the best was to express it with as less words as possible.
Anyway thanks to everyone for your comments.
- Janzert 17y agoThanks for the smaller image. While it was more of a surprise to me than an annoyance I'm sure all the dial-up users will be much happier with the smaller image. I am genuinely interested in knowing what tool(s) or possibly sequence of events led to such a poor png generation though. Can't wait to see future posts expanding on the four legs of the pyramid and measurements thereof. It certainly does seem like an interesting and useful way to think about it.