> The implementation would also likely be considerably more complicated than the 160 linues of code that the Spray Cache uses. Not likely, using Twisted deferr

> The implementation would also likely be considerably more complicated than the 160 linues of code that the Spray Cache uses. Not likely, using Twisted deferreds and a sane cache-wrapper with herd awareness -- you probably want this regardless of long-running cachables. Of course, Python 3.2 also has a futures [thread or process] builtin, if that's your thing. 10-20 lines of code.