3 ms·
Nope. They can show _with a high certainty_ that the image is not quite usual; that's still a pretty long shot from _proving_ the irregularity is actually stega
by Piskvorrr 13y ago
Nope. They can show _with a high certainty_ that the image is not quite usual; that's still a pretty long shot from _proving_ the irregularity is actually steganography (but that's where we leave the un/certainties of crypto and enter the realm of law).
- ChuckMcM 13y agoThat is a fair point, they can show it was altered and "likely" to have concealed data but not that it does. Which would leave a reasonable doubt one would hope. I joked with Peter Honeyman once that perhaps I should just add 'bite me nsa' as a secret steganagraphic message in all my images so that they would have something to read. He suggested that the people who make a habit of taunting the bears in the circus are the ones who show up in the stories about bear attacks :-)