4 ms·
If by 'worked' you mean that you were still able to sell it. It doesn't fit into the platform and nobody actually likes the result, but if you have a market ni
by pbsdp 13y ago
If by 'worked' you mean that you were still able to sell it.
It doesn't fit into the platform and nobody actually likes the result, but if you have a market niche, you can get away with it -- until a competitor appears that actually invests in what their users want.
- numo16 13y agoQt seems to be working alright for Autodesk Maya and Mudbox. They migrated the UI to it and everyone I've talked to that use these on various platforms don't really have any complaint about the UI (especially since they can use Qt, PyQt, etc... for building plugins).
- coffeaddict 13y agoAlso worth mentioning Qt Creator itself I would say.
- dman 13y agoAlso Sidefx Houdini
- zanny 13y agoAnd VLC, and Clementine, and Doomsday, Mathematica, Skype, and Virtualbox...
- pbsdp 13y agoAll of which are absolutely terrible looking applications with broken platform UX on Mac OS X.
- toyg 13y agoMost of which wouldn't even run on OSX if they weren't written in a cross-platform GUI that dramatically reduces development times. I'm sure the VLC guys would like to spend their days dealing with complicated video codecs rather than the craziness of yet-another-goddamn-GUI-platform.
- mrpippy 13y agoMathematica has a Mac-native frontend, and always has. They've used Qt for the Linux/Unix frontend since 6.0, not sure if they're using Qt for Windows or not.