3 ms·

I notice you list persecution of investigative journalists. What case were you thinking about?

by aet 13y ago

marvin 13y ago
Barrett Brown is the first name that comes to mind. Julian Assange is arguably in the same camp, at least partially. There has also been a sentiment that Glenn Greenwald should be prosecuted for his role in the Snowden case, albit not by government officials. The US does not systematically persecute investigative journalists, at least not yet. But the sentiment is there, and there are cases that have crossed the line. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrett_Brown http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrett_Brown http://falkvinge.net/2013/06/30/with-journalism-persecuted-the-united-states-is-now-at-event-horizon-to-a-police-state/ http://falkvinge.net/2013/06/30/with-journalism-persecuted-t...
- aet 13y ago
  I think it is a stretch calling him a journalist. I would consider him an activist.
  - marvin 13y ago
    Maybe. But the sentiment is there. This is a slippery slope, and the US is on its way down.
  - malandrew 13y ago
    Newsflash: Journalism has evolved. Technology changes things. There is more journalism done today by "activists" and "bloggers" than the mainstream media. You can tell just by watching the mainstream media and checking where they get a lot of their "scoops" from. The blogosphere is the new AP. It is now economically feasible to publish the entirety of recently public primary documents.
    - aet 13y ago
      There is an expectation of objectivity in journalism. I think being an activist makes it more difficult for readers to trust your objectivity. I'm not taking anything away from contributions from activists, they are often on the front lines, but that doesn't mean they are journalists.
      - malandrew 13y ago
        Such an expectation is grossly misplaced. Anyone who has ever watched the sausage being made will attest to that. It probably hasn't been objective since Cronkite and Edward R. Murrow, and these days only the journalists in the field, far from the newsroom are able to exercise the free will to be objective. People used to get into the news because they want to tell the truth, or that's the romantic story I've been told. However, I have rarely met anyone that went into journalism that was any more objective than activists and bloggers.
        aet 13y ago
        Okay, but I still don't think it is crazy to expect some level of objectivity in journalism. I suppose I'm thinking of news not editorials or opinion.
        malandrew 13y ago
        I think it would be nice to require color coding of the news by a fact-checking editor. Basically, anything that is a confirmed fact is highlighted in green. Anything considered fact, but hasn't been confirmed is highlighted yellow. And anything that is opinion or has no basis in reality is red. With that, just let users toggle things on and off in the article.
pqqqqq 13y ago
I'm not sure "persecution" is the right word for this, but the DOJ unilaterally seized phone records for several Associated Press journalists directly from the telephone company without notifying the AP first. Needless to say, this is a gross abuse of power; the AP couldn't even challenge the seizure in court because they executed the seizure secretly. It's particularly frightening because it dissuades anyone, particularly government officials potentially privy to corrupt programs & practices, from anonymously talking to journalists. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/20/business/media/head-of-the-ap-criticizes-seizure-of-phone-records.html http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/20/business/media/head-of-the... EDIT: here's a Wikipedia article on the topic: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Department_of_Justice_investigations_of_reporters http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Department_of_Justice_inve...

I notice you list persecution of investigative journalists. What case were you thinking about?

by aet 13y ago

I notice you list persecution of investigative journalists. What case were you thinking about?

Barrett Brown is the first name that comes to mind. Julian Assange is arguably in the same camp, at least partially. There has also been a sentiment that Glenn Greenwald should be prosecuted for his role in the Snowden case, albit not by government officials. The US does not systematically persecute investigative journalists, at least not yet. But the sentiment is there, and there are cases that have crossed the line. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrett_Brown http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrett_Brown http://falkvinge.net/2013/06/30/with-journalism-persecuted-the-united-states-is-now-at-event-horizon-to-a-police-state/ http://falkvinge.net/2013/06/30/with-journalism-persecuted-t...

aet 13y ago
I think it is a stretch calling him a journalist. I would consider him an activist.
- marvin 13y ago
  Maybe. But the sentiment is there. This is a slippery slope, and the US is on its way down.
- malandrew 13y ago
  Newsflash: Journalism has evolved. Technology changes things. There is more journalism done today by "activists" and "bloggers" than the mainstream media. You can tell just by watching the mainstream media and checking where they get a lot of their "scoops" from. The blogosphere is the new AP. It is now economically feasible to publish the entirety of recently public primary documents.
  - aet 13y ago
    There is an expectation of objectivity in journalism. I think being an activist makes it more difficult for readers to trust your objectivity. I'm not taking anything away from contributions from activists, they are often on the front lines, but that doesn't mean they are journalists.
    - malandrew 13y ago
      Such an expectation is grossly misplaced. Anyone who has ever watched the sausage being made will attest to that. It probably hasn't been objective since Cronkite and Edward R. Murrow, and these days only the journalists in the field, far from the newsroom are able to exercise the free will to be objective. People used to get into the news because they want to tell the truth, or that's the romantic story I've been told. However, I have rarely met anyone that went into journalism that was any more objective than activists and bloggers.
      - aet 13y ago
        Okay, but I still don't think it is crazy to expect some level of objectivity in journalism. I suppose I'm thinking of news not editorials or opinion.
        malandrew 13y ago
        I think it would be nice to require color coding of the news by a fact-checking editor. Basically, anything that is a confirmed fact is highlighted in green. Anything considered fact, but hasn't been confirmed is highlighted yellow. And anything that is opinion or has no basis in reality is red. With that, just let users toggle things on and off in the article.

pqqqqq 13y ago

I'm not sure "persecution" is the right word for this, but the DOJ unilaterally seized phone records for several Associated Press journalists directly from the telephone company without notifying the AP first. Needless to say, this is a gross abuse of power; the AP couldn't even challenge the seizure in court because they executed the seizure secretly. It's particularly frightening because it dissuades anyone, particularly government officials potentially privy to corrupt programs & practices, from anonymously talking to journalists. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/20/business/media/head-of-the-ap-criticizes-seizure-of-phone-records.html http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/20/business/media/head-of-the... EDIT: here's a Wikipedia article on the topic: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Department_of_Justice_investigations_of_reporters http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Department_of_Justice_inve...