5 ms·

"Apache is like Microsoft Word, it has a million options but you only need six. Nginx does those six things, and it does five of them 50 times faster than Apach

by pavs 13y ago

"Apache is like Microsoft Word, it has a million options but you only need six. Nginx does those six things, and it does five of them 50 times faster than Apache." Chris Lea

TylerE 13y ago
I'm not so sure I agree with that. Nginx is actually pretty featureful these days.
- FooBarWidget 13y ago
  But all those features can be implemented efficiently. There are a lot of things that Nginx does not support, that would make Nginx slower if it did support that. .htaccess support for example.
  - TylerE 13y ago
    This may be arguing semantics, but I don't consider that a feature, as anything doable via .htaccess is doable via the main config. (not to mention that nginx supports graceful hot reloads so it's not a problem to manually force it to rescan the main config.
    - FooBarWidget 13y ago
      The WordPress Supercache plugin automatically sets up a .htaccess with mod_rewrite rules to enable caching. On Apache, it just works. On Nginx without .htaccess support it would have to tell the user to copy-paste a snippet. Ouch, not so friendly. And this is even assuming the user has access to the web server config file.
      - TylerE 13y ago
        Could just as easily drop a file in conf.d in a typical distro nginx install too.
      - dangayle 13y ago
        In my experience, switching to a properly configured NGINX server running PHP-FPM with memcached negates much of the need for Supercache to begin with. Caching plugins tend to cause subtle problems all over the place for WordPress plugins, so I prefer to run "bare metal" as much as I can. Also, I can't imagine anyone running NGINX without having access to the config file.
        flaktrak 13y ago
        I completely agree with this and anyway many of the caching programs are starting to understand that nginx is out there. I am pretty sure w3 total cache does. However since using nginx I have done away with caching as it is so much faster than apache + caching that I don't really need it.
        dangayle 13y ago
        That's my point. For any small/medium sites, switching to NGNIX will make a dramatic improvement on all aspects of your site, while dicking around with caching will cause you endless headaches.
        jacques_chester 13y ago
        Actually, WP Supercache and nginx can form an awesome team. You configure WPS to spit out gzipped copies of each page on disk, then you configure nginx to serve gzipped pages directly whenever they are found (gzip_static and try_files). Basically you can serve compressed pages straight off disk. And thanks to the miracle of operating system file caching, it's usually straight from memory.

by pavs 13y ago

"Apache is like Microsoft Word, it has a million options but you only need six. Nginx does those six things, and it does five of them 50 times faster than Apache." Chris Lea

TylerE 13y ago

I'm not so sure I agree with that. Nginx is actually pretty featureful these days.

FooBarWidget 13y ago
But all those features can be implemented efficiently. There are a lot of things that Nginx does not support, that would make Nginx slower if it did support that. .htaccess support for example.
- TylerE 13y ago
  This may be arguing semantics, but I don't consider that a feature, as anything doable via .htaccess is doable via the main config. (not to mention that nginx supports graceful hot reloads so it's not a problem to manually force it to rescan the main config.
  - FooBarWidget 13y ago
    The WordPress Supercache plugin automatically sets up a .htaccess with mod_rewrite rules to enable caching. On Apache, it just works. On Nginx without .htaccess support it would have to tell the user to copy-paste a snippet. Ouch, not so friendly. And this is even assuming the user has access to the web server config file.
    - TylerE 13y ago
      Could just as easily drop a file in conf.d in a typical distro nginx install too.
    - dangayle 13y ago
      In my experience, switching to a properly configured NGINX server running PHP-FPM with memcached negates much of the need for Supercache to begin with. Caching plugins tend to cause subtle problems all over the place for WordPress plugins, so I prefer to run "bare metal" as much as I can. Also, I can't imagine anyone running NGINX without having access to the config file.
      - flaktrak 13y ago
        I completely agree with this and anyway many of the caching programs are starting to understand that nginx is out there. I am pretty sure w3 total cache does. However since using nginx I have done away with caching as it is so much faster than apache + caching that I don't really need it.
        dangayle 13y ago
        That's my point. For any small/medium sites, switching to NGNIX will make a dramatic improvement on all aspects of your site, while dicking around with caching will cause you endless headaches.
      - jacques_chester 13y ago
        Actually, WP Supercache and nginx can form an awesome team. You configure WPS to spit out gzipped copies of each page on disk, then you configure nginx to serve gzipped pages directly whenever they are found (gzip_static and try_files). Basically you can serve compressed pages straight off disk. And thanks to the miracle of operating system file caching, it's usually straight from memory.