3 ms·
I haven't seen anyone elsewhere point out that maybe he is onboard. It may not be the case, but there must have been some convincing information to convince va
by shubb 13y ago
I haven't seen anyone elsewhere point out that maybe he is onboard.
It may not be the case, but there must have been some convincing information to convince various countries to do this, and our evidence against is the departure site and the president's word.
There is an ongoing tension between a block of south American countries (see the Argentinian tweets on github), and the USA. Non-violent aggressive acts like this, or conversely offering asylum, are part of it.
The US has strongly resisted any external influence on the rest of the continent, as a doctrine. Now a block is forming locally, they will go to great lengths to resist it. I think an explanation for why the block is upset in turn can be found in the leaked cables.
- enko 13y ago> I haven't seen anyone elsewhere point out that maybe he is onboard. I've seen speculation along those lines, especially since it emerged they didn't allow a proper search. A "walk-through" indeed - I would be willing to bet there's at least 10 places he could have been hiding. It will be absolutely hilarious if he turns out to have been on board all along. Apparently, however, the plane left from a different airport, so I don't know how he could have gotten from one to the other without having to officially enter Russia.